- From: Vivien Lacourba <vivien@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 10:51:44 -0400
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
- Cc: "Nacho ..." <ilm991070@hotmail.com>
[forwarding to the Web-Ontology Comments mailing list] On Wed, 1969-12-31 at 18:59, Nacho ... wrote: > Hello, I'm a computer science student from Madrid, Spain. Sorry my bad > english, please. > Sorry basic question, but I have read RDF and OWL specifications and I would > like assure this: > > (1) > OWL is an language which allows user to make "meaning" to the terms created > by a RDF scheme. It is an extension to the RDF scheme. > RDF without OWL allowed to describe resources, properties and them > relationship but with OWL it allow RIGHT MEANING besides. > For example, RDF can define the term "autor", which is a property to "Book", > but OWL can define "autor" is "person responsible in creation of a document" > for example. > > Is this correct? > > > (2) > If I wish to use MARC format in order to catalogue my virtual library, I use > RDF (without OWL) and use a namespace like for example > http://marc.org/descriptions/library#. Then I can to use properties defined > in http://marc.org/descriptions/library# like for example autor, title, etc. > > Is this correct? > > > (3) > Dublin Core scheme is a RDF scheme or an ontology defined by using OWL? > > Thank you very much. > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latam.msn.com/amor/
Received on Monday, 3 May 2004 11:05:03 UTC