- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:13:05 -0500
- To: Mikhail Khlopotov <mik@chel.com.ru>, public-webont-comments@w3.org
At 5:56 PM +0500 1/4/04, Mikhail Khlopotov wrote: >Hello! > >I'm trying to use OWL in my research, in which I need a way to >represent constraints on a semantic network, and while studying OWL >and analyzing it's completeness, I found no direct way to express >"transitive over" properties, I mean properties, which are not >transitive by themselves, but are transitive over another property. >For example "worksFor" may be considered transitive over >"consistsOf", if we have a company consisting of departments. > >Are there any ways in current OWL to express such a relations? I >suppose, they're vital for part-whole relationship. > >Hope, this message is clear to understand ;-) > >Sincerely, Mikhail Khlopotov >South Ural State University, Russia. Miikhail - this is an interesting question, and Jos de Roo has moved it to the www-rdf-logic@w3.org mailing list, as that is a good place to discuss such things. Let me give a factual answer her however, just for clarity. There is currently no mechanism in OWL for expressing what you are suggesting directly. - Jim Hendler -- Professor James Hendler http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-277-3388 (Cell)
Received on Sunday, 4 January 2004 15:13:16 UTC