- From: Minsu Jang <minsu@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:28:37 +0900
- To: "'Christoph Mangold'" <Mangold@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>, <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
Hi, In the section 1.3 of OWL Overview[1], there's a paragraph stating that if you want to attach properties to classes, you need OWL Full. Hope this helps, Minsu [1] OWL Overview (http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/) > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webont-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-webont-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Christoph Mangold > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:06 PM > To: public-webont-comments@w3.org > Subject: Modeling question > > > > > Hi, > > as a newbie I built a taxonomy of terms in (I believe) OWL Light where > each term in my taxonomy is an owl class. Now I want to introduce a > relationship "referTo" to connect related terms. > > I could introduce a property "referTo" to connect related classes. > However, this is no solution unless I use owl Full since in Light/DL > classes can not be individuals, i.e., they can not be connected by > individuals of properties. > > Am I missing something? Can this (IMO simple) modeling task only be > fulfilled in Full? Is it a good idea to model the terms as > individuals > (and not classes)? > > Any comments appreciated > > Chris >
Received on Friday, 20 February 2004 19:28:47 UTC