- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:44:07 -0500
- To: John Colgrave <colgrave@hursley.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Sorry for the delay in responding to your message. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2004Apr/0010.html You're quite right that "The first sentence of the second paragraph in section 2.1 is repeated." I noted this among the errata. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/errata#owl-semantics $Id: errata.html,v 1.4 2004/08/06 02:39:16 connolly Exp $ Regarding "I can't find a mention of a Namespace terminal in the description of the Abstract Syntax." The abstract syntax is a specification mechanism; many details regarding practical use as an exchange mechanism were not dealt with; the OWL semantics says: "The syntax used here is rather informal, even for an abstract syntax - in general the arguments of a construct should be considered to be unordered wherever the order would not affect the meaning of the construct." and so on. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2004 22:43:57 UTC