- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:51:33 +0300
- To: lesch@w3.org
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
I also s/working drafts/Working Drafts/ all these are done, see editors draft http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/ dated 22nd September. [[ Test Cases [5] s/web/Web/ s/web-site/Web site/ s/working group/Working Group/ s/favourable/favorable/ s/members of this group working group/participants in this Working Group/ ]] A question, I saw you commented on the compound document structure of OWL Semantics & Abstract Syntax. [S&AS] Is the one I've used OK for OWL Test Cases. For many earlier drafts , not having a compound document was perceived as a problem. The current solution involves generating the three single document versions M.html L.html and XXL.html and then xslt-ing the (informative) XXL.html version with the script below to make the normative compound document. http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/multipart.xsl However, I didn't find any guidance as to W3C policy for such things, and basically just copied S&AS and some other TR but I forget which. I would be happy to entertain changes to the xslt, less happy with suggestions that could not easily be addressed that way. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 11:52:25 UTC