- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:44:12 -0500
- To: Sooyoung Oh <runtou@etri.re.kr>, Moonyoung Chung <mchung@etri.re.kr>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-webont-comments@w3.org
Hello, I recently discovered your ezOWL work http://iweb.etri.re.kr/ezowl/ I haven't tried it out yet, but it looks very interesting from the screenshots and tutorial. Nice work! >From our implementation report http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/impls you can see that we were aware of another protoge plugin... http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/ but to me, at least, ezOWL is news. I got your contact information from http://iweb.etri.re.kr/ezowl/contact.html I wonder if you have any feedback to report as a result of your implementation experience. Is ezOWL able to load any or all of the documents from our test collection? http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/ Are you aware of any of our tests that don't work as expected in ezOWL? Which parts of the OWL specs did you find most useful? Which parts were most difficult to work with? Did you find anything that looked like a bug? Are there any features that you particularly like? Do you see any missing features in OWL that aren't adequately explained by our requirements and objectives http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/#section-objectives or a decision to postpone an issue? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/webont-issues.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 09:44:13 UTC