public-webont-comments@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• owl usage with xml schema leb27@drexel.edu
• Re: OWL usage Jim Hendler

Monday, 29 September 2003

• owl:imports http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl Bijan Parsia
• Re: OWL usage Joanne Luciano

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• Re: [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Sandro Hawke
• Re: [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Youyong Zou

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• small remark on OWL Guide edhel

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• RE: OWL usage Holger Knublauch
• Re: OWL usage Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL usage Joanne Luciano
• RE: [Jena-devel] Re: Jena2 OWL semantic tests - preliminary results Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• Re: Jena2 OWL semantic tests - preliminary results Dave Reynolds
• Re: Jena2 OWL semantic tests - preliminary results Sandro Hawke
• Re: [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Sandro Hawke
• Re: [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Jena2 OWL semantic tests - preliminary results Dave Reynolds
• Re: why not collapse sameAs, equivalentClass...and other questions Jim Hendler
• why not collapse sameAs, equivalentClass...and other questions Raik Gruenberg
• Fw: OWL usage Matt Halstead

Monday, 22 September 2003

• New Pellet Results Michael Grove
• RE: Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Smith, Michael K
• Re: Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Jeremy Carroll
• [closed] Re: mini typo in OWL reference Mike Dean

Sunday, 21 September 2003

• mini typo in OWL reference Benjamin Nowack
• Re: Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Susan Lesch
• Re: Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Deborah L. McGuinness
• Comments for CR-owl-semantics-20030818 Susan Lesch
• Comments for OWL Candidate Recommendation Susan Lesch
• Protege's owl ontology page Jim Hendler

Friday, 19 September 2003

• ontology example hydrologic units Luis Bermudez
• Re: Proposed reply for O rdf:type owl:Ontology optional? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Using OWL Dan Connolly
• Re: Using OWL Jim Hendler
• Using OWL Illarramendi Echave. Arantxa

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? pat hayes
• [ANN] OWL Test Results Page & Web Form Sandro Hawke
• ezOWL looks nifty; any feedback to offer? Dan Connolly
• OWLP version 0.5 available from Bell Labs Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re[2]: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Jim Hendler
• Re[2]: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Benjamin Nowack
• Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Jim Hendler
• Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Dan Connolly
• Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Dan Brickley
• Re: OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? pat hayes
• OWL CR feedback: owl:Class 'vs' rdfs:Class causing pain. Is owl:Class really needed? Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Fwd: OWL exit criteria: very close! Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• comment/question on OWL Reference Benjamin Nowack

Monday, 8 September 2003

• Guilty? You Decide! Famous Trials

Sunday, 7 September 2003

• A very NEWBIE question Zhu Bin

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Re: Various Overview Doc Comments Deborah McGuinness

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: a question about reasoner Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• FIPA endorsement Jim Hendler

Monday, 1 September 2003

• RE: XSD namespace in guide Smith, Michael K
• Various Overview Doc Comments Jeff Rafter

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 16:01:07 UTC