- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:19:59 +0200
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Dave, Thanes for your comment. See responses in-line. Dave Beckett wrote: > OWL Web Ontology Language Reference > W3C Working Draft 31 March 2003 > > Appendix B. RDF Schema of OWL (Normative) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owl-ref-20030331/#appB > > The RDF schema for OWL appears in a Normative appendix of the > Informative OWL Reference Appendix B is not normative. Te label "(normative)" in the Appendix title is an update error. It has been corrected in the editor's drafts [1]. Note: the editor's draft is an unofficial version maintained by the editors to keep track of editorial changes during LC. > > Can you have a normative part of an informative document? It might > be that it would be better to describe more fully the status of this > appendix content. > > Please also include the URI of the RDF/XML that this appendix > corresponds to or may be found, if there is one so that it may be > used directly -- for example, in testing. At present, you have to > cut and paste the HTML. > We added a link to such an document in the editor's draft. See: http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl > (This is unrelated to the question of the bits found behind when > dereferencing some XML Namespace URI - I just ask that the URL of the > this content be made available. ) > > Thanks > > Dave Please let us know whether this response is satisfactory. Thanks, Guus [1] http://www.daml.org/2002/06/webont/owl-ref-proposed -- NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003 Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 08:20:03 UTC