- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 02:13:51 -0700
- To: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: "webont-comments at W3C" <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
That avoids the issue of whether or not a Class is an individual, which I understand is the case in OWL FULL. The Individual - Class distinction is the source of much confusion, and I think it is desirable to explicitly discuss this in Section 5.2. ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guus Schreiber" <schreiber@cs.vu.nl> To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net> Cc: "webont-comments at W3C" <public-webont-comments@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 2:07 AM Subject: Re: "sameIndividualAs" error in OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003 > Richard H. McCullough wrote: > > > Section 5.2 says sameIndividualAs has domain and range of Individual > > > > Appendix B says sameIndividualAs has domain and range of Thing > > You're right that the following sentence in Sec. 5.2 is phrased too sloppy: > > [[ > The property owl:sameAs has as its domain and range an individual > ]] > > I propose to change this sentence to: > > [[ > The property owl:sameAs takes an individual as subject and object. > ]] > > Please let us know whether this response is satisfactory. > > Thanks for comment, > Guus Schreiber > > > > ============ > > Dick McCullough <mailto:rhm@cdepot.net> > > knowledge <http://rhm.cdepot.net/> *:=* man *do* identify *od* existent > > *done;* > > knowledge <http://www.volcano.net/~rhm/knowledge> *haspart* proposition > > list; > > -- > NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003 > > Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science > De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands > Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 > E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl > Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction] > >
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 05:14:28 UTC