- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Here is a reply for the unanswered issue in your message. > --- owlsas-rdfcore-unnamed-ontologies > > Section 3.4 > Unnamed ontologies: informally, multiple Annontations on an unnamed > ontology don't need to be satisfied by the same "x" according to this > table. Don't think that's right. The newest editor's draft of S&AS (of 4 June 2003, available at http://www-db.research.bell-labs.com/usr/pfps/owl/) has a new Section 3.4 that should satisfactorily address this issue. The basic change is that the interpretation of Ontology Annotations is done in an environment where there is a resource for the ontology, named or not as evidenced by the following wording: there is some o ∈ R such that for each Ontology Annotation of the form <span class="syntax">Annotation(</span>p v<span class="syntax">)</span>, <o,S(v)> ∈ ER(p) and that if O has name n, then S(n) = o; Please reply to this message as to whether this response is satisfactory, copying public-webont-wg@w3.org. Again, thank you for your comments. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Friday, 13 June 2003 11:41:49 UTC