- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:38:15 +0100
- To: public-webont-comments@w3.org, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Hi Peter thanks for your message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0022 We accept the responses to comments 1, 4 and 5. We accept the current situation with comment 3, but note that WebOnt still has to consider changes resulting from RDF Core's decision to drop the rdf:type rdf:List triples, and point out that making the rdf:type owl:Class triples optional in all cases would help ameliorate our concerns here. We note that comment 2 is essentially a special case of the comment about descriptions in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0048.html and we will respond further on that thread. We are not requiring any further response on this thread and are happy for it to be closed. Jeremy on behalf of the Jena Team
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 04:42:14 UTC