- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:53:26 -0400
- To: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>, public-webont-comments@w3.org
Dear Bob-
Thank you for your comment, the working group has considered it
carefully. With respect to qualified keys, we considered how this
could be added to OWL - see the discussion thread starting at [1] and
particularly [2]. The group considered the addition of Qualified
Cardinality Restrictions, which we believe are needed to implement
the sort of global keys you need. However, the WG decided to
postpone the issue of QCRs as discussed in my response to Alan Rector
at [3].
We also considered the issue of Compound Keys. We decided this was
an important enough area to open an issue on our issues list
explicitly. We did not, however, come up with a solution as to how
to address these. Instead we also decided to postpone this issue.
The issue text is:
>TITLE: Compound Keys
>DESCRIPTION:
> Relational Databases often use keys that are composed of multiple
>fields. OWL allows keys using owl:InverseFunctionalProperty for a
>single field (property). It would be desirable for OWL to provide
>the compound keys capability as well.
>STATUS: POSTPONED
>RAISED BY: J. Hendler based on a Last Call comment raised by Bob
>MacGregor:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0019.html
>
>Closing Comments:
>
>While compounds keys would be desirable to add, there is some
>difficulty in adding them in the current OWL syntax, similar to the
>problem arising for "qualified" properties (see discussion under
>issue 3.2). In addition, for the OWL DL profile, it is still
>something of a research issue (c.f.
>http://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~calvanes/papers-html/DL-2000.html) as to
>how these are best realized by DL reasoners. There is also a
>question as to whether mixing datatype and object type in a compound
>key would be allowed, and whether it would cause difficulties to
>reasoners.
>
Please let us know if this decision to (a) acknowledge that our
design is lacking, but (b) postpone further design work to a future
version is acceptable.
-Jim Hendler
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0064.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0085.html
[3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0024.html
--
Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 13:53:34 UTC