- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:57:57 -0600
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 07:39, Roger L. Costello wrote: > 1. All RDF Schemas are also OWL Full ontologies. True or False? True, with the minor exception that a document that uses owl:nameNotInTheSpec, it's still an RDF Schema but fails to be an OWL Full ontology. 4.1.1. Syntactic Conformance http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test/#syntaxConformance > 2. All OWL DL ontologies are OWL Full ontologies. True or False? True. One more nit: the spec formally defines the terms 'OWL DL document' and 'OWL Full document', not 'OWL DL ontology' nor 'OWL Full ontology'. Hmm.. though we do seem to use 'OWL DL ontology' informally in the overview. -- http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/#s1.3 > 3. Not all OWL Full ontologies are OWL DL ontologies. True or False? True. > 4. All OWL Lite ontologies are OWL DL ontologies. True or False? True. > 5. Not all OWL DL ontologies are OWL Lite ontologies. True or False? True. > Thanks! /Roger -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 09:04:04 UTC