- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:02:13 +0100
- To: "tm-pubsubj-comments" <tm-pubsubj-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>, <public-webont-comments@w3.org>
From Requirements for OWL (W3C Ontology Web Language) http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/ <quote> 4 Requirements ... Ontologies as distinct objects Ontologies must be objects that have their own unique identifiers, such as a URI reference. ... Unambiguous term referencing with URIs Two terms in different ontologies must have distinct absolute identifiers (although they may have identical relative identifiers). It must be possible to uniquely identify a term in an ontology using a URI reference. </quote> This is definitely an use case for Published Subjects. So I invite people in OASIS PubSubj TC to have a close look at OWL Requirements at above quoted address, and people in Web Ontology Working Group to have a close look at Published Subjects ongoing work at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/docs/recommendations/psdoc.htm BTW Eric Miller said publicly last week in KT 2002 at Seattle that the answer to my question: "Are Published Subjects relevant to the Semantic Web?" was "Definitely YES" ... ... and therefore disappeared with the floppy of my presentation :)) So ... what's next? Bernard Vatant Chair - OASIS TM PubSubj Technical Committee www.oasis-open.org/committees/tm-pubsubj/
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 13:02:49 UTC