- From: Olle Olsson <olleo@sics.se>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:10:58 +0200
- To: public-webizen@w3.org
It just struck me that the statistics for the very first question will very likely reach 100% "yes". > Should W3C reach out to the broader Web community to create such a > program for increased affiliation? > ---- > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > People that do feel a "no" is relevant will most likely not provide their input to the form. So do not draw too strong conclusions from the answers to that question. /olle On 2014-09-11 10:39, Jean-Charles Verdie via WBS Mailer wrote: > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Webizen Program > interest survey' (public) for Jean-Charles Verdie. > >> --------------------------------- >> Should W3C reach out to the broader Web community to create such a >> program for increased affiliation? >> ---- >> >> > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Would you be interested in joining this program? >> ---- >> >> >> > * (x) Show me where to sign up :) > * ( ) Probably. > * ( ) It would depend on the benefits package I receive. [see questions > below] > * ( ) I'd need time to think about it. > * ( ) No. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Should the program be designed as a minimalist program (point A)? >> ---- >> >> Point A: The minimalist extreme asserts that there does not need to be >> any initial set of benefits, just provide a virtual identity and people >> who want a greater affiliation with W3C will sign up. >> >> Should the program be designed as a minimalist program? >> > * ( ) Yes, any tangible benefits diminishes the program. > * ( ) It should start minimalist just to get it off the ground, but then > those that sign up should guide W3C on what benefits are most important. > * (x) No. > * ( ) I don't know. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Should there be benefits that increase W3C posture as a community (point >> B)? >> ---- >> Point B: Some have argued that there should at least be benefits which >> help make W3C more into a "community". >> >> Should there be benefits that increase W3C posture as a community? >> > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > * ( ) Not important to me, but not harmful to have such benefits. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> If you answered yes to Q6, which of the following would be interesting? >> ---- >> Answering this question is optional. >> [Select all that are appropriate] >> >> >> >> > * [x] Invitation to teleconference organized once annually by the CEO for > a discussion of W3C's activities and plans. > * [x] A unique ID number (associated with this program) > * [x] Listing your profile on the W3C website. > * [x] A "flourish" next to where name appears in Community Group and > Working Group list of participants. > * [x] Accumulate "participation points" for every spec reviewed. > * [x] Name listed on our Supporters page (with # years). > * [ ] Voice in a Community blog linked from W3C blog. > * [ ] A two-hour welcoming session via conference call to explain how W3C > works (conducted on a semester basis, in 3 time-slot regions) > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Should there be tangible benefits to this program (point C)? >> ---- >> Point C: Others have argued that people should get tangible benefits >> with monetary value. >> >> Should there be tangible benefits to this program? >> >> [Select all that are appropriate] >> >> > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > * ( ) Not important to me, but not harmful to have such benefits. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> If you answered yes to Q8, which of the following would be interesting? >> ---- >> Answering this question is optional. >> [Select all that are appropriate] >> >> >> > * [ ] Annual T-shirt. > * [ ] Participation in annual T-shirt design competition. > * [ ] Stickers, mug, other 'goodies'. > * [x] Discounts of W3C services of interest to individuals; such as W3C > Validator Suite and certain conference fees. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Should there be a mechanism where Webizens are represented at the >> decision making of W3C (point D)? >> ---- >> >> Point D: Still others have argued that this should be more than >> "affiliation", that people that sign up for this program should get some >> benefits reserved for Members of W3C. >> >> Should there be a mechanism where Webizens are represented at the >> decision making of W3C? >> > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > * ( ) Not important to me, but not harmful to have such benefits. > >> >> --------------------------------- >> If you answered yes to Q10, would the creation of different Developer >> Groups under the Webizen banner - to provide AC Charter review be an >> adequate form of representation? >> ---- >> >> Answering this question is optional. >> > * (x) Yes > * ( ) No > >> >> --------------------------------- >> Should we name this program the Webizen program? >> ---- >> We are having a hard time coming up with a name for the program. So far >> we are using the term Webizen - which has not been overly popular - but >> we don't have a better name. >> >> Should we name this program the Webizen program? >> >> > * (x) That's the perfect name. > * ( ) Not great, but good enough. > * ( ) No, please choose a better name. > Optional (suggest name): > > >> >> --------------------------------- >> One last thing... >> ---- >> What are your own perspective on this program and ideas you may have? >> >> > Comments: > > >> These answers were last modified on 11 September 2014 at 08:37:13 U.T.C. >> by Jean-Charles Verdie >> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/webizen-survey/ until 2014-09-30. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Olle Olsson olleo@sics.se Tel: +46 8 633 15 19 Fax: +46 8 751 72 30 [Svenska W3C-kontoret: olleo@w3.org] SICS [Swedish Institute of Computer Science] Box 1263 SE - 164 29 Kista Sweden ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 15:11:17 UTC