- From: Tim Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:08:40 +1000
- To: "Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com>
- Cc: "public-webizen@w3.org" <public-webizen@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <C25C1D30-7A1E-4FCE-9157-12DB802CFA03@gmail.com>
We’ve also got a Facebook page set-up https://www.facebook.com/Webizen 49 people have engaged in less than 12 hours. Perhaps if list members could share the social links, describing the concept we’re trying to build that would be materially helpful ;) Tim.H On 11 Sep 2014, at 10:12 am, Crawford, Mark <mark.crawford@sap.com> wrote: > I would prefer we keep all data to the TF until we make decisions, then make both normalized and raw data available to anyone with the understanding that it will most likely result in some negative press depending on the contents of the raw data. > > Best Regards, > Mark > > > From: Coralie Mercier [mailto:coralie@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:04 PM > To: public-webizen@w3.org > Cc: tobie.langel@gmail.com > Subject: Our options for sharing survey results - Fwd: Tobie Langel (@tobie) replied to one of your Tweets! > > > Dear Webizen task force, > > I realize we didn't go far enough last week in our considerations of the results. > cf. http://www.w3.org/2014/09/05-webizen-minutes.html > > As a consequence the survey and the accompanying blog post are devoid (survey) or evasive (blog) with regards to what we'll do with the results. > > WBS is set up to show results only to the Team. This is what we wanted as it prevents people from being influenced by existing feedback. WBS can be set up to allow "anybody", or "anybody with member access" to see the results. This can be changed when the survey has closed. > > My understanding is that we (the Team) would compile public numerical data and significant results, vs. showing raw data. We don't know yet what data we might get (especially on the write in comments). > > Tobie Langel (see below) suggests being more open. How much open should we be? > > Please, let's discuss our options: > 1. share raw results publicly (including any written comments) > 2. share raw results to anyone with member access > 3. share compiled results publicly > 4. something else > > Thank you. > > Coralie > > ------- Forwarded message ------- > From: "Tobie Langel (via Twitter)" <notify@twitter.com> > To: "W3C Webizen" <coralie.webizen@w3.org> > Subject: Tobie Langel (@tobie) replied to one of your Tweets! > Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:44:33 +0200 > > @W3C_Webizen :( What about being a tad more open? And what about the compiled results, public or AC only? - @tobie > > <image001.jpg> > > > W3C Webizen, > Tobie Langel replied to your Tweet! > > <image002.jpg> > > > <image003.jpg> > > > > <image004.jpg> > Tobie Langel @tobie > > > > @W3C_Webizen it's unclear whether you plan to publicly share the raw data of your survey. Can you please clarify? - 10 Sep > > > <image005.jpg> > > More Tweets > > > <image004.jpg> > W3C Webizen @W3C_Webizen > > > > .@tobie the expectation within the task force was to compile significant results and numerical data, as opposed to sharing raw data. - 10 Sep > > <image006.jpg> > Tobie Langel @tobie > > > @W3C_Webizen :( What about being a tad more open? And what about the compiled results, public or AC only? > > > > > 08:44 PM - 10 Sep 14 > > > > <~WRD000.jpg> > Replyto@tobie > <image007.jpg>Retweet > <image008.jpg>Favorite > Forgot your Twitter password? Get instructions on how to reset it. > You can also unsubscribe from these emails or change yournotification settings. Need help? > If you received this message in error and did not sign up for Twitter, click not my account. > Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market St., Suite 900 San Francisco, CA 94103 > <image003.jpg> > > > -- > Coralie Mercier - W3C Communications Team - http://www.w3.org > mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 01:14:23 UTC