Survey Questions

Response to survey [1]

Q1 = Yes
Q2 = Probably (but it would depend on the benefits beyond CG participation, etc.)
Q3 = NO.  It’s important that the role / participation as a member, is meaningful (beyond the merchandise) 
Q4 = Yes
Q5 = Perhaps all of the listed + more?

I’ve found that in my ‘on-boarding’ into CG work, people have helped tremendously including W3 Staff.  This has been a progressive thing, and will continue to be.  Perhaps benefits can develop overtime?

(i note; i don’t think i’m listed on the participant list - yet, the posts will be discoverable via lists.w3 - perhaps the listing, is important where participation is taking place in a private group)

Q6 = Yes.  

Q7 = Perhaps a membership discount on merchandise and/or on-boarding pack - but it should mean more than a T-Shirt or keyring…

Q8 = I think the mechanisms around the group policy (i.e. WG, IG, etc.) should have as an option - participation for Webizen.  Some initiatives are more focused / private / confidential(?), others are public.  Perhaps Webizen sit somewhere in the middle.  I imagine each group, has a bunch of settings.  Webizen could be one of them.  This may also be useful for organisations who may not see the benefit of W3 membership, and an individual is interested in evangelising W3 within the organisation, via an individual membership. 

Q9 = I’m not sure developer groups under the webizen banner would benefit W3C.  CG facilitates much of this task already.  Webizen appears more to be a participation group, rather than a development group - or method, as otherwise formatted for instance, via CG’s. 

Q10 = Webizen is cool.   Yet, the name is perhaps the least important thing…  Perhaps W3 Citizen.  Perhaps ask #WebWeWant 

Timothy Holborn
https://twitter.com/webcivics



[1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen