- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 15:57:49 +0100
- To: JC Verdie <jicheu@yahoo.fr>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- CC: public-webizen@w3.org
On 28/03/2014 15:29 , JC Verdie wrote: > Pardon me if it’s been mentioned before, but things such as google > analytics would be helpful for such statistics. I’m pretty sure that > saying that will raise a public flamewar but there are may be similar > tools carrying less controversy? I don't think that it needs to raise a flamewar, but it is likely incompatible with our privacy policy. There are other tools, but as far as I know (which is quite likely not the whole story) they fall in two buckets: those that rely on an external site and would therefore pose a privacy problem, and those that you run yourself and would therefore require some systeam time which is likely better prioritised elsewhere, at least in the short term. I don't think that finding out the real number matters much. Given the usual access stats on our wiki (whenever I've noticed them at least) I think that it shows this page is "popular". I don't believe it really matters by which order of magnitude. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 28 March 2014 14:57:58 UTC