Re: "Webizen" task force re-convening - Please complete doodle poll

Regrets+ JC Verdié


Jeff Jaffe wrote:
> The poll has been stable for a few days.  There seems to be a clear
> consensus on 1 August at 8AM ET.  Details to follow.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On 7/2/2014 3:56 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>> This past spring we used this mailing list and a small task force to
>> define a Webizen proposal [1].  This was presented to the W3C
>> Membership several weeks ago.  The short summary is that while they
>> liked the concept of more individual affiliation with W3C, few people
>> liked the specifics of the proposal.  However, they asked that we
>> re-create the task force and come up with a better approach. 
>>
>> There are now many more people subscribed to public-webizen who want
>> to work to make this successful, including over a dozen people that
>> were at the meeting last month.
>>
>> Coming up with a new proposal will require some art because different
>> folks had different reasons for rejecting [1].  For example, some
>> thought that [1] provided Webizens with too many benefits, others
>> thought there were too few benefits of importance, others thought that
>> the benefits were not that relevant.  The task force we have signed up
>> for this second round will help us get all the issues on the table,
>> and hopefully a consensus proposal.
>>
>> I anticipate about 5-6 one hour calls and some work in between calls
>> to build this new proposal.  The first call is important so we start
>> on the same page.  Please complete the doodle poll [2].
>>
>> The draft agenda for the first call is:
>>
>> 1. Goals for program
>> 2. Success criteria for program
>> 3. Target market and marketing study
>> 4. Brainstorming
>>
>> To have a more efficient call, let me say a bit in email about these
>> agenda items.
>>
>> *Goals for the program*:  I was challenged to articulate the goals of
>> the program.  The questioner suggested 5 potential goals:
>>
>> A. W3C wants to establish itself as the primary steward of the Web,
>> and toward that goal wants to have individuals participate.
>>
>> B. Countries grant citizenships -- W3C  wants to create Webizens a la
>> Citizens
>>
>> C. W3C  wants to involve the wider community -- rather than be seen as
>> a place where only companies play
>>
>> D. W3C wants to create an additional revenue stream
>>
>> E. Degrading further: W3C  wants to sell t-shirts and coffee-mugs that
>> are "branded".
>>
>> My response was:
>>
>> "It is closest to C.
>>
>> In the wiki [1] we say 'The idea of the program is to allow
>> individuals to affiliate with the Web standards community  ... we seek
>> to make available a new means to congregate as a community.'"
>>
>> We should see if that is the consensus, or if the consensus is one of
>> the other points, or something else.
>>
>> *Success criteria for the program*:  This is an area which needs some
>> development.  My starting point (which is informal and not precise) is
>> that people who sign up find it useful and we don't lose any money. 
>> Others have proposed more precise criteria, such as:
>>
>>   * More than 500 webizens in 2 years.
>>   * Most of our Invited Experts become webizens in 2 years.
>>
>> *Marketing study.*  At some point we will need to do a marketing
>> study.  It is probably too early in this effort to create the study -
>> but I would like to discuss what we think is the minimum intensive
>> study which qualifies as a marketing study.  I asked W3C Members to
>> fund a marketing study (dollars or people to perform the study) but I
>> received not volunteers.  The Team, with its meager resources
>> volunteered to undertake a study.  I've asked task forcers whether the
>> Team proposal is adequate, but I've gotten few responses.  So we'll
>> resolve it on the call.
>>
>> For your study, here is the Team proposal:
>>
>>   * We have 87K twitter followers.
>>   * We could send them a survey monkey survey with a few questions,
>>     and offer anyone who completes the survey 10 vaildator coupons.
>>   * We estimate that we get 100 answers that way at relatively low cost.
>>   * The Webizen task force would design the survey and the Team would
>>     implement it.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webizen
>> [2] http://doodle.com/ihry7d6vhh8dr9p6
> 

Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2014 08:55:46 UTC