Re: Freezing ED WebID 1.0 2014

Could just flag it as of no concern to current CG efforts.

I'm not sure why it's even raised in the context of (what I understood to
be) our focus and efforts.

Perhaps there is some clarity missing as to what we were doing?

On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, 21:51 Melvin Carvalho, <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've been observing the permathread concerning potential edits to the
> established ED WebID 1.0 2014 specification. It appears that these
> discussions may be impeding our forward momentum.
>
> I hold a firm stance against altering this document. A considerable amount
> of diligent work was invested in its creation, and it has seen wide
> adoption. Moreover, there's burgeoning interest within the Solid Working
> Group to evolve this into a W3C Recommendation—a goal we've previously
> agreed upon with consensus.
>
> In light of this, I propose we put a hold on any further modifications to
> this specification to maintain focus within the Community Group. We might
> also revisit this conversation subsequent to the formal establishment of
> the Solid Working Group.
>
> To express my stance unequivocally, I am adamantly opposed to any
> revisions to this stable, decade-old spec that continues to be actively
> utilized.
>
> Looking ahead to 2024, I am very much in favor of embarking on new
> endeavors, such as collectively refining our understanding of what
> constitutes a WebID.
>