- From: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:57:43 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Hello Kingsley, > Who has implementation concerns regarding this direction? Ideally, they should identify themselves and participate in the discussion. I don’t want to speak for others but, off the top of my mind: - Wouter has made this point multiple times, one of which in [1]. - Sarven has made this point at least once in [3] (and you have +1ed that comment). - Solid appears to require clients to request "WebID Profiles” using text/turtle or application/ld+json [2] (though I am confused as to whether they actually meant to use Content-Type rather than Accept). This doesn’t mean we necessarily need to follow what Solid does; I’m just pointing this out to keep track of potential breaking changes with respect to what others are doing; interop. with the current ecosystem is also a priority. I can dig up more if you’d like me to, though I would prefer to let people speak their own mind. Best, Jacopo. [1]: https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/3#issuecomment-1879750583 [2]: https://solid.github.io/webid-profile/#reading-profile [3]: https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/17#issuecomment-1877196126
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2024 08:58:05 UTC