Re: Quick WebID CG roll call

+1 Active on the implementation side

On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 11:30 AM Ed - 0x1b, Inc. <w3c@0x1b.com> wrote:

> +1. But mostly an observer so far - interested on the devops side -
> need to know where togo next, if it comes to that
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 8:09 AM Albert Esterline <esterlin@ncat.edu> wrote:
> >
> > +1 With limited objectives
> >
> > Dr. Albert C. Esterline
> > Department of Computer Science
> > North Carolina A&T State University
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: P. J. Łaszkowicz <p.j@fillip.pro>
> > Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 10:43 AM
> > To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> > Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
> > Subject: Re: Quick WebID CG roll call
> >
> > USE CAUTION. This message is from outside of N.C. A&T.
> > ________________________________
> >
> > +1 active. Quietly on new implementation at the moment, but very keen to
> see this developed further.
> >
> > > On 3. Nov 2023, at 16.40, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Just a quick question to see who's still active in the WebID CG
> > >
> > > +1 active
> > >
> > > +1 to continuing the work on WebID, but only if there is sufficient
> interest from members
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- NOTICE: This e-mail correspondence is subject to Public Records
> Law and may be disclosed to third parties. --------
>
>