- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 13:37:35 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhK9NaqLPHwSx1io-EHWf65hq=ASexQx0KHSSxNSnVEnbQ@mail.gmail.com>
čt 2. 11. 2023 v 13:31 odesílatel Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> napsal: > > On 11/1/23 5:52 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:16 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Group >> >> I trust this message finds you well. >> >> Over the last couple of days in Solid CG we have been discussing the >> possibility of a "Solid-Lite" spec. >> >> I have begun drafting it, but there's two remaining sections that I need >> to complete. >> >> 1. A lite WebID profile >> 2. A lite authentication method for said profile >> >> Considering recent events, it's entirely understandable if the group >> feels hesitant to pursue the WebID Specs further. I've made an effort to >> capture our previous discussions and integrated aspects from Nathan's >> superset/subset proposal, which you can review here: >> >> https://github.com/webidcg/draft-spec >> >> So I was wondering if there is an appetite to carry on working, or to >> call it a day. We dont have a chair but we were operating via Jacopo's >> proposal of lazy consensus. >> >> We could use that system to decide whether or not to close the group. >> >> Or to carry on and complete Nathan's suggestion. >> >> Does anyone have thoughts on this? >> > > For human to human and basic uses, "what is your webid? it's <x>" will > suffice > > For machine readable data, a type Agent, and a property with a domain of > Agent would suffice. > > For anything more advanced, such as protocol usage to verify ownership > (webid-tls for example) or similar, then further requirements may be > placed, such as constraining a media type set or determining a validation > method. > > I guess, how much does the group want to specify? > > At a bare minimum, I'd say "a type Agent, and a property with a domain of > Agent " is required, then perhaps a spec to say x,y,z media types have an > ontology describing this available. > > > Hi Nathan, > > A WebID is just an identifier. It has to stay as just that. It SHOULD > resolve to a profile document, which is where things get challenging. > > A WebID profile document should comprise a machine-computable description > of its subject (named by a WebID). I encourage the use of an HTML doc > comprising metadata delivered as an RDF-based structured data island using > JSON-LD, Microdata, or Plain Old Semantic (POSH). > > Why is this important? > > Profile documents need to be familiar to both end-users and developers, > the only document type that satisfies that condition is HTML. > > Storyline: > > The self-sovereign identity and eventual privacy control journeys start > from a WebID that resolves (without explicit content negotiation) to a > profile document i.e., via a "#" based fragment identifier. > > Terminology: > > RDF -- an abstract language for structured data expression (using a > variety of notations) and representation (using a variety of serialization > formats). > With JSON-LD 1.1 you can do both: From : https://solid-lite.org/ { "@context": "http://w3id.org/webid", "primaryTopic" { "@id": "#me", "@type": "Person", "name": "Will Smith", "img": "avatar.png", "knows": "http://alice.example/#me", "publickey": "1234abc" } } This can either be standalone or in a script tag in html. Best of ever world. > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com > Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com > Weblogs (Blogs): > Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog > Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog > Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers > > Personal Weblogs (Blogs): > Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen > Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ > http://kidehen.blogspot.com > > Profile Pages: > Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ > Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen > Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > Web Identities (WebID): > Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i > : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this > >
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2023 12:37:54 UTC