- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 23:10:55 +0100
- To: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLiN0KCj0yML+oj3aUW-is1A0nDjdixLD1c0kWFMfntzw@mail.gmail.com>
st 1. 11. 2023 v 22:52 odesÃlatel Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> napsal: > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 9:16 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Group >> >> I trust this message finds you well. >> >> Over the last couple of days in Solid CG we have been discussing the >> possibility of a "Solid-Lite" spec. >> >> I have begun drafting it, but there's two remaining sections that I need >> to complete. >> >> 1. A lite WebID profile >> 2. A lite authentication method for said profile >> >> Considering recent events, it's entirely understandable if the group >> feels hesitant to pursue the WebID Specs further. I've made an effort to >> capture our previous discussions and integrated aspects from Nathan's >> superset/subset proposal, which you can review here: >> >> https://github.com/webidcg/draft-spec >> >> So I was wondering if there is an appetite to carry on working, or to >> call it a day. We dont have a chair but we were operating via Jacopo's >> proposal of lazy consensus. >> >> We could use that system to decide whether or not to close the group. >> >> Or to carry on and complete Nathan's suggestion. >> >> Does anyone have thoughts on this? >> > > For human to human and basic uses, "what is your webid? it's <x>" will > suffice > > For machine readable data, a type Agent, and a property with a domain of > Agent would suffice. > > For anything more advanced, such as protocol usage to verify ownership > (webid-tls for example) or similar, then further requirements may be > placed, such as constraining a media type set or determining a validation > method. > > I guess, how much does the group want to specify? > > At a bare minimum, I'd say "a type Agent, and a property with a domain of > Agent " is required, then perhaps a spec to say x,y,z media types have an > ontology describing this available. > Would I would need right now would be: 1. a concrete data example that could be copy and pasted, maybe this would be JSON(-LD) with an @context, or something similar 2. an authentication-lite method for that data example (in order to test)
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2023 22:11:13 UTC