Re: Assessing consensus and our voting process

Dear Jacopo, and All,

> On 6. Jul 2023, at 12:22, Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> wrote:
> 
> 1. Assessing consensus by means of “lazy consensus”, in which lack of objection after sufficient notice is taken as assent
> 2. Defining a minimum threshold of active support beyond which a vote is considered valid


I prefer 1 over 2.

Best regards
Martin


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Professor Dr.-Ing. Martin GAEDKE
Director of the University Computing Center
Dean of the Faculty of Computer Science 
Head of Professorship Distributed and Self-organizing Systems

TU CHEMNITZ
Str. der Nationen 62 | Room A11.319
D-09107 Chemnitz 
Germany    

P: +49 371 531-13400, University Computing Center
P: +49 371 531-25000, Faculty of Computer Science
P: +49 371 531-25530, Professorship VSR Secretary 
E: martin.gaedke@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de
W: https://vsr.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/about/people/gaedke/

Received on Monday, 10 July 2023 22:15:44 UTC