Re: webid serializations consensus 2023

st 5. 7. 2023 v 14:43 odesílatel Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
napsal:

> > I'm very reluctant to get into the use case of low power devices,
> because it could derail the whole conversation.  It should be evident to
> people on this list, that contexts can be inlined too though.
>
> I agree, we can move this specific topic to a different conversation
> should we feel like delving further into it. As a general and personal
> point, though, I think that good specs often have the quality of limiting
> if not eliminating the additional constraints that often need to be laid on
> top them in support of their adoption.
>
> > That would depend on the editors time and availability.  The CG can
> help, but we need someone to get it over the line.
>
> Personally, I would not be comfortable in working on the spec itself. I
> believe the spec has too many readability / structural issues that I would
> want to address if I were to produce something as its editor. But, I would
> be happy to work on a separate document illustrating where we stand.
>
> > It has to be a two step process.  First we have to agree we want to add
> JSON-LD.  Then we have to create the appropriate text and examples.
> >
> > Most of the w3c linked data stack has moved to JSON-LD now.  By 2025
> everyone will be using JSON.
> >
> > What is generally done is that examples are put in the spec, and
> developers use that as copy and paste.
> >
> > The SHOULD/MUST is a separate topic.  Last time we voted on it.  I think
> most could live with either wording, or a variation on it.
>
> @Henry, if I were to do this would you be willing to help with calling a
> few votes?
>

Please feel free to directly request the group's perspective when needed.
As an editor, you can either call a vote or propose a straw poll without
prior request.