- From: Jeremy Lewi <jeremy@lewi.us>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:37:55 -0700
- To: Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com>
- Cc: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACijwiYZAyiV0uK=X0_d7qfSJ6Q65kfba0_Lwjh4gGFwG=xHEA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi That's very helpful. Are there any metrics or other indicators of how widely adopted WebID is? Other than Solid, are there examples of applications or services utilizing WebID? J On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 2:05 AM Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> wrote: > Hello Jeremy, > > I’ve started working on a revision of the spec that *might*, hopefully, > gather enough support to make some headway towards the goal of becoming a > W3C spec. No guarantees. > > Some discussion about this can be found in the archives at > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webid/2022Feb . I’ve been > significantly delayed by work and life stuff but I’m finally getting back > to it next week. > > Best regards, > Jacopo. > > --- > > Jacopo Scazzosi > https://jacoscaz.com > https://treesandrobots.com > > > > > On 21 Jul 2022, at 22:51, Jeremy Lewi <jeremy@lewi.us> wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > What's the current status of the WebID proposal? It seems like the > proposal has been around for 10+ years but hasn't become a W3C > recommendation. > > > > This thread suggests that progress has stalled in part because the spec > has gained very little adoption. Can anyone provide more context/opinions > on why progress/adoption has stalled? Were their technical objections to > the spec or was the spec solving a problem most folks didn't have? > > > > How does the future of WebID relate to DID's which I believe recently > became a W3C recommendation (blog)? Would WebID be compatible or superseded > by DID web? > > > > Thanks > > J > >
Received on Friday, 22 July 2022 16:24:44 UTC