Re: WebID 1.0 Editors Draft

On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 at 11:25, Jacopo Scazzosi <jacopo@scazzosi.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I understand that some editors prefer a PR-based process. However, the
> extent
> of the changes that we are discussing requires an organic revision of the
> entire document, something which I am personally unable to approach through
> issue-specific PRs - particularly when issues affect one another.
> Furthermore,
> I find mailing lists to be a more inclusive and neutral medium.
>
> My plan is to gather enough feedback through this list to produce a single,
> cohesive, organic PR upon which the community would then be able to
> comment and
> discuss further changes, with most of the work happening before opening
> the PR
> itself.
>
> > 1. The Editor must be able to edit the spec
>
> That would be ideal, although I would also be happy working on my own fork
> of
> the repository.
>
> 2. Substantive changes must go to the mailing list and allow objections
>
> Fully agree.
>
> 3. Objecters should be satisfied before publishing a new 1.x doc
>
> Fully agree. Of course, this comes at the risk of the mediating and editing
> effort becoming unsustainable, which I suspect might have happened in the
> past.
> Nonetheless, I believe it is the best course of action and it is also the
> one
> I am most comfortable with.
>

Sounds good!


>
> Best regards,
> Jacopo.