- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:47:54 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKTuS9PfSWBv8g_OgUuKPBbevhZFiom1WYF3g0vj9_WRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 12:52, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 31 Mar 2021, at 12:28, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 17:46, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks David for these detailed improvements! > > That is just what was needed to incite me to think about evolving the > document. > > > > Now that W3C has moved to github, I guess we need to find out if there > is a github repo > > where all this data is stored, and if we can access it to evolve the > document. > > > > We've been flagging editorial improvements, bug fixes, and other changes > since at least 2013, more in 2015, 2019, 2020 etc. > > > > The truth is that no one knows how to make any changes, and we dont have > anyone that can drive them forward > > Is there a link to a list of these? Do you want to put this together? > > I was away trying to build stuff, trying to get EU projects together, then > studying mathematics and category theory ;-) > > I have received a grant for an EU project this year so I will have time to > do some cleanup. > > https://nlnet.nl/project/SolidControl/ > > Hopefully we just have some simple things to do, as there is so much other > work to > be done. > Great to hear, congrats! I dont have a list But typically it's helpful to have 2 chairs if one is away doing stuff Looking forward to seeing webid attribute control! > > > > > IMHO we need a new chair for this to happen > > > > > > Henry > > > > > > > On 24 Mar 2021, at 15:09, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > > > > > > This is a nice, concise little write-up of a basic principle. Thanks > for doing it! > > > > > > I have one substantive comment. At the beginning of section 4, I like > the diagram, but I do not understand the "sense" arrow and do not see why > it is needed at all. AFAICT, there are *two* things being differentiated: > the profile document versus TimBL (the person) -- not three. So to my > mind, the "sense" arrow only adds confusion. Also, I do not understand the > purpose of the stick-figure on the profile document. There is no stick > figure in the profile document, so I do not understand why the diagram > shows one on it. The diagram also shows a foaf:made link coming from the > stick figure and pointing to the bottom of the profile card. I don't > understand what that is intended to mean, but TimBL's profile card does not > even contain a foaf:made link, so that seems to be a mistake. > > > > > > Aside from that, I noticed several editorial issues that I thought you > might like to correct: > > > > > > 1. The "Latest editor's draft" link goes to > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html > > > which has a "This version" link that is 404: > > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/drafts/ED-webid-20121118 > > > > > > 2. s/which/that/ in "A WebID is an HTTP URI which refers to an Agent" > > > See https://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/01/that-versus-which.html > > > > > > 3. Change "that any Social Network user is familiar with" to "that > would be familiar to any Social Network user". > > > > > > 4. Change "to link together their profiles in a public" to "to link > their profiles in a public". > > > > > > 5. s/resource/resources/ in "by allowing access to resource" > > > > > > 6. s/such that/such as that/ in "such that he/she is known" > > > > > > 7. Change "A Server is a machine contactable at a domain name or IP > address that hosts a number of globally accessible Services." to > > > "A Server is a machine, contactable at a domain name or IP address, > that hosts globally accessible Services." > > > > > > 8. s/given/particular/g in "A Service is an agent listening for > requests at a given IP address on a given Server" > > > > > > 9. s/which/that/ in "A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme > which denotes an Agent" > > > > > > 10. s/which/that/ in "A WebID Profile is an RDF document which > uniquely describes" > > > > > > 11. s/Alice/Bob/g in "Therefore, two URIs are needed, one for Alice > and one for the homepage or a RDF document describing Alice" > > > > > > 12. Change "Which one to use depends on the situation, both have > advantages" to > > > "Which one to use depends on the situation. Both have advantages" > > > > > > 13. The sentence beginning "The WebID Profile gives the sense of the > WebID:" seems to be attempting to define the word "sense", because it puts > that word in italics. I don't think that is necessary or helpful. I think > it would be more readily understandable just to write (with no italics): > "The WebID Profile defines the meaning of the WebID:" > > > > > > 14. s/another document/other documents/ in "contain relations to > another document depicting" > > > > > > 15. s/RDFa/RDFa,/ in "even if it is not marked up in RDFa" > > > > > > 16. s/as well/as well as/ in "may contain public as well personal" > > > > > > Thanks, > > > David > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 18:48:18 UTC