- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:42:42 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54AAB0F2.3070109@openlinksw.com>
On 1/4/15 2:34 PM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > On 2015-01-04 19:49, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 1/4/15 10:27 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: >>> On 2015-01-04 16:21, Timothy Holborn wrote: >>>> Interesting. I found more info [1] >>>> >>>> Does it support WebID-TLS? >>> >>> It is primarily intended to lower the cost (maybe to zero) for getting >>> a TLS server-certificate. >>> >>> For WebID-TLS there's no hope. The industry have take another route. >>> >>> Anders >> >> Happy New Year! >> >> Again, WebID-TLS and TLS are loosely coupled items. The industry hasn't >> gone anywhere, it is mired in an identity and trust crisis. >> >> I strongly encourage you to put your personal biases aside. Doing that >> will enable you understand where WebID-TLS and similar approached re. >> Blogic (webby logic) fit into the mix re., addressing the identity and >> trust problem that's putting every Web and Internet users privacy at >> risk etc.. > > There are 25M Korean users of X.509 certificates on the web. How many > users > have WebID-TLS? 100? 1000? 10000? What is WebID-TLS to you? X.509 != TLS let alone WebID-TLS. X.509 its a standard for creating a digital representation of an Identity Card (Certificate). There isn't an such notion as "having WebID-TLS" it is simply a protocol for verifying claims in a WebID-Profile document that you lookup via a WebID placed in an X.509 Certificate. > > What's worse is that the 25M users are being *pushed off the web* since > plugins are about to be "outlawed". X.509 and Browser Plugins two distinct things. I don't understand why you continue to conflate all the puzzle-pieces. > Sweden, another big user of X.509+Web has > already left the web (browser) for Android and iPhone app-based > solutions. This isn't about Web Browsers. It is about verifying identity claims over HTTP using trust Webs crafted using logic. > > Do you have any solution to this? What is the problem? > Do I? YES! W3C must perform market > research and not only rely on a handful of big-tech technologists who > mainly run their own agenda. The W3C's job is to formalize aspects of Web usage that aren't formalized. For instance, RDF is a retrospective formalization of what's always been a nascent part of the Web, since inception. Kingsley > Anders > >> >> Let's try to be more constructive in 2015, complaining about everything >> without offering any practical alternatives, gets us nowhere! >> >> Kingsley >>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://letsencrypt.org/howitworks/ >>>> >>>> On 4 January 2015 at 22:01, cdr <mail@whats-your.name >>>> <mailto:mail@whats-your.name>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > a financial issue, being the cost of a >>>> > domain and wildcard SSL certificate. >>>> >>>> Let's Encrypt is attempting to address this >>>> >>>> seth@EFF giving a talk on how it works: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZyXx8Ie4pA&t=17m >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 15:43:06 UTC