- From: Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 23:13:57 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
On 2014-May-19, at 23:05, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> For WebID-X.509 a specific WebID policy OID would be ideal since it >> doesn't interfere with anything else. > > And that would change what in regards to Browser behavior, in their current form? Browsers which implemented it would only prompt for selection of certificates containing the extension which the server said it wanted (similarly to how the list is filtered now if you request client certs from specific CAs, but without it being so horribly kludgy). Browsers which didn’t implement it would behave as they do now. It’s very sensible, and I’d love to see it happen — though I’m not about to hold my breath. M. -- Mo McRoberts - Chief Technical Architect - Archives & Digital Public Space, Zone 2.12, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA. Inside the BBC? My movements this week: http://neva.li/where-is-mo ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 23:14:29 UTC