W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > May 2014

Re: Should WebIDs denote people or accounts?

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 11:01:38 -0400
Message-ID: <5378CB52.5060905@openlinksw.com>
To: public-webid@w3.org
On 5/17/14 8:05 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Oh, very interesting.   I haven't found an opportunity to talk to TimBL about this specifically, but it sounds like he's thinking in the same direction.   In that email he's very clearly showing a WebID denoting a persona, not a person.
Sandro,

A WebID denoting an Agent isn't disjoint with the notion of personae. 
When I demonstrate WebIDs across Facebook, LinkedIn Twitter, G+, and 
many other social media spaces [2][3], I actually refer to the whole 
things as being about a given persona.  None of that negates the fact 
that a WebID denotes an Agent.

We have to loosely couple:

1. identity
2. identifiers
3. identification
4. identity verification (e.g., when authenticating identification)
5. trust.

Claims represented as RDF statements handle 1-5, naturally. We don't 
have a problem here, really.


[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/persona
[2] https://twitter.com/kidehen/status/419578364551499776
[3] https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/posts/1pmt4gWWae2

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen






Received on Sunday, 18 May 2014 15:01:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:55 UTC