- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:20:03 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 18:20:29 UTC
On 5/17/14 1:36 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Also, foaf:account is neither FP nor IFP, which I think is correct. > One could make an IFP variation, something like "individualsAccount" > which would make it work more nicely for identifying humans. Or > "singleAgentAccount" if its for foaf:Agents. Yes, of course. That's what RDF (as you know) enables re. IFP based relations. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 18:20:29 UTC