- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:21:13 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53150E69.80608@openlinksw.com>
On 3/3/14 5:08 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/03/03/triplehandshake.html Yes, note "In short, the TLS handshake hashes in too little information, and always has. Because of that it's possible to synchronise the state of two TLS sessions in a way that breaks assumptions made in the rest of the protocol." Well, those assumptions will always be brittle if a TLS handshake is the be all and end all. Once again, this is why WebID, WebID+TLS, and Trust Logic are a much better solution for this problem. Our challenge remains: 1. getting the WebID spec out 2. showcasing how it addresses these problems via RDF based Linked Data augmentation 3. cognitive dissonance that swirls around anything to do with RDF and the Semantic Web vision. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 3 March 2014 23:21:43 UTC