- From: Tim Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 22:12:56 +1000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E9CF8B36-1D68-4168-AB48-917A04EBC4B1@gmail.com>
On 10 Jun 2014, at 10:12 pm, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 6/9/14 10:43 PM, Tim Holborn wrote: >> >> On 10 Jun 2014, at 10:36 am, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10 June 2014 01:49, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 10 Jun 2014, at 2:26 am, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 June 2014 17:30, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Kingsley, >>>> >>>> thanks for the response. Yes. Current format of WebID (specifically) is simply FOAF. Calling it WebID when it means FOAF is well... FOAF. >>>> >>>> WebID is not coupled to FOAF. Is FOAF ever mentioned in the spec? >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/identity/ >>> >>> Sorry, my mistake. FOAF is indeed mentioned in the spec. But it is not coupled. >> >> Ok. My mistake - i thought it was coupled. >>> >>> "WebIDs can be used to build a Web of trust using vocabularies such as FOAF [FOAF]" >>> >> Perhaps the documentation could include / notate other vocab used in connection to a WebID-TLS certificate; for example, >> >> http://xmlns.com/wot/0.1/ >> http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ >> http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap >> http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns >> >> (Which all appear to also use FOAF) >> >> I also found: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-vocab-data-cube-20140116/ >> >> >>> But the point is that webid is not coupled to FOAF. >> >> Cool. >> >> >> Cheers. >> > > ACID test question: > > Can I make a document comprised of Identity claims, represented using RDF statements, that uses relations to assert possession of a keypair, where none of the relations use terms from the FOAF vocabulary? > > Answer: Yes! > > The <http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#cert> relation isn't FOAF vocabulary based. Cool. Perhaps you could show how something like Cimba gets your name and storage location without using FOAF? > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2014 12:15:24 UTC