Re: [foaf-dev] Credentials Community Group

On 8/1/14 7:21 AM, Peter Williams wrote:
> Have they emerged, or are they just manufactured in lawyerly tradition?
>
> Cannot wait to hear how a w3c culture addresses the morass. If its 
> more of the same, then we add another label to the pile.
>
> I like foaf's philosophical approach - allowing lawyerly 
> interpretation of a concept, while denying the per eminence of any one 
> interpretation. I like foaf insisting that no identity dogma has 
> relevance to foaf itself - in the sense that foaf exists to verily 
> resist any and all dogma, including whatever w3c politics comes up 
> with. Foaf and its spinoffs like webid exist to have the continuing 
> conversation and see what logic itself can produce.

+1

[1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/9CR7WMPC -- processed from the RDF 
embedded in my earlier response to a related thread .

-- 
Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this

Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 14:31:27 UTC