On 8/1/14 7:21 AM, Peter Williams wrote: > Have they emerged, or are they just manufactured in lawyerly tradition? > > Cannot wait to hear how a w3c culture addresses the morass. If its > more of the same, then we add another label to the pile. > > I like foaf's philosophical approach - allowing lawyerly > interpretation of a concept, while denying the per eminence of any one > interpretation. I like foaf insisting that no identity dogma has > relevance to foaf itself - in the sense that foaf exists to verily > resist any and all dogma, including whatever w3c politics comes up > with. Foaf and its spinoffs like webid exist to have the continuing > conversation and see what logic itself can produce. +1 [1] http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/9CR7WMPC -- processed from the RDF embedded in my earlier response to a related thread . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 14:31:27 UTC