W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > September 2013

Formal WebID Teleconf Friday September 4, 2013 14:00UTC

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:44:04 +0200
Message-Id: <CA59F53C-481B-49ED-B89A-FF0B21322E11@bblfish.net>
To: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>

Friday 14:00-15:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local, 16:00 Paris time )
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID")
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=09&day=27&year=2013&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0

Agenda:

Open Actions:

  http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/open

Issues:

ISSUE-68: Privacy Considerations Section:
   http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/68
I will send the spec for review to the privacy group this week

ISSUE-71: Switch from URI to IRI
    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/71

ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing
   http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/24
    -> I think we should add that WebIDs Profiles should be made public, and not require any authentication ( or else infinite loops will occur )
    -> If the user owns the server then he is the only person who will know of the request
    
ISSUE-73: Security section in the Definition Spec
    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/73
     
ISSUE-72: privacy consideration section in Definition Spec
    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/72

ISSUE-18 Transfer Protocol Independence
    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/18
    Done

Major:
 
   Set timetable to publish current mercurial draft on CVS repo at http://webid.info/
 
   What do we need to do next to get these specs more formally adopted?


Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 16:44:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:52 UTC