- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:44:04 +0200
- To: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
Friday 14:00-15:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local, 16:00 Paris time )
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID")
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=09&day=27&year=2013&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
Agenda:
Open Actions:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/open
Issues:
ISSUE-68: Privacy Considerations Section:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/68
I will send the spec for review to the privacy group this week
ISSUE-71: Switch from URI to IRI
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/71
ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/24
-> I think we should add that WebIDs Profiles should be made public, and not require any authentication ( or else infinite loops will occur )
-> If the user owns the server then he is the only person who will know of the request
ISSUE-73: Security section in the Definition Spec
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/73
ISSUE-72: privacy consideration section in Definition Spec
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/72
ISSUE-18 Transfer Protocol Independence
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/18
Done
Major:
• Set timetable to publish current mercurial draft on CVS repo at http://webid.info/
• What do we need to do next to get these specs more formally adopted?
Henry
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 16:44:37 UTC