- From: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:30:56 +0200
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20130926173056.4370.92523@bastian.jones.dk>
Quoting Seth Russell (2013-09-26 16:51:54) > I think you missed the point. How does the client know to whom they > talk? The <Organization> should be filled in on these certificates. > Certificate authorities are suppose to require verifiable bona fides > from those to whom they issue certificates. That's what we pay for. > Now i certainly acknowledge that doesn't really make the net more > trustworthy ... but that is what it was suppose to accomplish. Do we > now need to acknowledge that the Emperor has no clothes? How about > ICANN issueing these certificates free - just fill out the form - no > questions asked - no bona fides at all needed or asked for. I may very well have missed what you intended to ask, but your actual question was if "this way of certifying actually certify anything to a information consumer?", and it does. Cheap certificates do certify something. Less than higher quality certificates, and possible not enough for your liking, but something. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2013 17:33:06 UTC