- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:27:58 +0200
- To: "Erich Bremer" <erich@ebremer.com>
- Cc: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
On 11 Sep 2013, at 18:20, "Erich Bremer" <erich@ebremer.com> wrote: > Would it be better to name WebID-TLS: > > WebID-HTTP/TLS > > Considering TLS is used in other protocols like SMTP, IMAP, POP, etc? Whereas it is indicated that it is over HTTP given the definition of WebID in the TLS context, it may be clearer to the WebID newcomer to explicitly mention HTTP in the title rather than to have to discover the fact only after reading the specification? - Erich The spec should make it clear that this works with other TLS protocols. I think it does. See the section with the UML sequeence diagram. > > ========================================================== > Erich Bremer > http://www.ebremer.com > http://haylyn.io > > > On Sep 5, 2013, at 9:53 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > >> Dear WebID Community Group, >> >> we now have three specs up on github here >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index.html >> >> All editors think that it is time to publish a new version >> on the W3C WebID Incubator space, to finalise the distinction >> between WebID, WebID-TLS, and the cert ontology. >> >> So we would like to be able to publish the specs above >> at the following location, by Friday 20 September 2013 >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/ >> >> We would be very happy to receive feedback from >> the community before doing so. If you can spot >> any errors or improvements please let us know, >> we'll do our best to get them in before publication. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Henry Story >> >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 11 September 2013 16:29:00 UTC