- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:57:43 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <522A33B7.4040305@openlinksw.com>
On 9/6/13 3:05 PM, Henry Story wrote: >> >> It should really be: >> >> </http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*> (a Reference) as >> opposed to //"http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card >> <http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card>*#i*"/ (a Literal) :-) >> >> >> I disagree. There we are talking about the URI components, not the >> RDF representation of the URI. For example, it's meant to be used >> when giving someone your WebID, as opposed to the URI of your WebID >> profile document: "Here is my WebID: >> http://bob.example.org/profile#me. Please add me as your friend". > > Agree . > </http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*> refers to tim > berners lee/ > / "//http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*" is the URI that > refers to tim berners lee./ If the above is clear to the reader, then fine. Unfortunately, I don't think that it is clear to the typical reader. <http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*> is the best of both worlds. "/http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*"/ is ultimately confusing, based on my experience in the field. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:58:05 UTC