W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Request for Review of WebID specs before publishing

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:57:43 -0400
Message-ID: <522A33B7.4040305@openlinksw.com>
To: public-webid@w3.org
On 9/6/13 3:05 PM, Henry Story wrote:
>>
>>     It should really be:
>>
>>     </http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*> (a Reference) as
>>     opposed to //"http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card
>>     <http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card>*#i*"/ (a Literal) :-)
>>
>>
>> I disagree. There we are talking about the URI components, not the 
>> RDF representation of the URI. For example, it's meant to be used 
>> when giving someone your WebID, as opposed to the URI of your WebID 
>> profile document: "Here is my WebID: 
>> http://bob.example.org/profile#me. Please add me as your friend".
>
> Agree .
>   </http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*>  refers to tim 
> berners lee/
> / "//http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*" is the URI that 
> refers to tim berners lee./
If the above is clear to the reader, then fine. Unfortunately, I don't 
think that it is clear to the typical reader.

<http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*> is the best of both worlds.

"/http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card*#i*"/ is ultimately 
confusing, based on my experience in the field.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen





Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:58:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:52 UTC