- From: Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:14:31 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:15:32 UTC
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html 2.2.1.1Cryptographic Vocabulary "The following properties/should/be used when conveying the relation between theSubject <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html#dfn-subject>and his or her key, withinWebID Profile <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html#dfn-webid_profile>documents:" Shouldn't "SHOULD" be "MUST"? - Erich On 09/05/13 9:52 AM, Henry Story wrote: > Dear WebID Community Group, > > we now have three specs up on github here > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index.html > > All editors think that it is time to publish a new version > on the W3C WebID Incubator space, to finalise the distinction > between WebID, WebID-TLS, and the cert ontology. > > So we would like to be able to publish the specs above > at the following location, by Friday 20 September 2013 > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/ > > We would be very happy to receive feedback from > the community before doing so. If you can spot > any errors or improvements please let us know, > we'll do our best to get them in before publication. > > Thanks, > > Henry Story > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:15:32 UTC