- From: Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:14:31 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:15:32 UTC
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html
2.2.1.1Cryptographic Vocabulary
"The following properties/should/be used when conveying the relation
between theSubject
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html#dfn-subject>and
his or her key, withinWebID Profile
<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html#dfn-webid_profile>documents:"
Shouldn't "SHOULD" be "MUST"? - Erich
On 09/05/13 9:52 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> Dear WebID Community Group,
>
> we now have three specs up on github here
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index.html
>
> All editors think that it is time to publish a new version
> on the W3C WebID Incubator space, to finalise the distinction
> between WebID, WebID-TLS, and the cert ontology.
>
> So we would like to be able to publish the specs above
> at the following location, by Friday 20 September 2013
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/
>
> We would be very happy to receive feedback from
> the community before doing so. If you can spot
> any errors or improvements please let us know,
> we'll do our best to get them in before publication.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Henry Story
>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:15:32 UTC