W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > September 2013

Re: Request for Review of WebID specs before publishing

From: Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:08:42 -0400
Message-ID: <522A283A.30804@ebremer.com>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>

"The protocol does not depend on any particular serialization of the 
graph, provided that agents are able to parse that serialization and 
obtain the graph automatically, see examples in the [WEBID 

this statement conflicts with:


"A WebIDProfile Document 
a Web resource that/must/be available as|text/turtle|[turtle 
but/may/be available in other RDF serialization formats (e.g. [RDFA-CORE 
if requested through content negotiation."

         I thought text/turtle was a minimal requirement?  - Erich

On 09/05/13 9:52 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> Dear WebID Community Group,
>    we now have three specs up on github here
>     https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index.html
> All editors think that it is time to publish a new version
> on the W3C WebID Incubator space, to finalise the distinction
> between WebID, WebID-TLS, and the cert ontology.
> So we would like to be able to publish the specs above
> at the following location, by Friday 20 September 2013
>    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/
> We would be very happy to receive feedback from
> the community before doing so. If you can spot
> any errors or improvements please let us know,
> we'll do our best to get them in before publication.
>     Thanks,
> 		Henry Story
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:09:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:52 UTC