- From: Erich Bremer <erich@ebremer.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:08:42 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <522A283A.30804@ebremer.com>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html "The protocol does not depend on any particular serialization of the graph, provided that agents are able to parse that serialization and obtain the graph automatically, see examples in the [WEBID <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html#bib-WEBID>] specification." this statement conflicts with: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html "A WebIDProfile Document <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html#dfn-profile_document>is a Web resource that/must/be available as|text/turtle|[turtle <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html#bib-turtle>], but/may/be available in other RDF serialization formats (e.g. [RDFA-CORE <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html#bib-RDFA-CORE>]) if requested through content negotiation." I thought text/turtle was a minimal requirement? - Erich On 09/05/13 9:52 AM, Henry Story wrote: > Dear WebID Community Group, > > we now have three specs up on github here > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/index.html > > All editors think that it is time to publish a new version > on the W3C WebID Incubator space, to finalise the distinction > between WebID, WebID-TLS, and the cert ontology. > > So we would like to be able to publish the specs above > at the following location, by Friday 20 September 2013 > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/ > > We would be very happy to receive feedback from > the community before doing so. If you can spot > any errors or improvements please let us know, > we'll do our best to get them in before publication. > > Thanks, > > Henry Story > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:09:42 UTC