- From: Roman Evstifeev <someuniquename@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:50:31 +0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
At first i thought it was some copy-paste error os the like. But now i got this. I still see sentence as not-so-clear: For WebIDs .., the URI ... Here "the URI" does seem like it is "THE URI" that was mentined earlier, but i can hardly guess how it is related to the context before comma. This is not because "WebID is URI" link is not clear to the reader (to me at least), this is because the wording used. On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 10/27/13 8:55 AM, Roman Evstifeev wrote: >> >> Ok, i think i got it, but this was really hard. Wording may be better, >> like: >> <<If WebID contains fragment identifier (e.g. #me), the Profile >> Document itself is denoted by the same url without fragment >> identifier>> >> >> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Roman Evstifeev >> <someuniquename@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/tls-respec.html >>> Section 1.2, Terminology: >>> Paragraph 1, WebID: >>> <<For WebIDs with fragment identifiers (e.g. #me), the URI without the >>> fragment denotes the Profile Document.>> >>> This sentence says what? >> >> > Roman > > The basics: > > 1. HTTP URIs denote things (entities) -- Web Documents and anything else > 2. HTTP URLs (a kind of URI) denote HTTP accessible Documents, specifically > 3. HTTP URIs that denote an Agent (a kind or entity/thing) are WebIDs . > > All we have to do is find ways to make this clear in our material. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 11:51:00 UTC