- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 12:52:07 +0200
- To: "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>
[ I am back home with Internet connection. This is the internet connection from last week moved ] Friday Oct 11, 14:00-15:00 UTC (10:00am-11:00am Boston local, 16:00 Paris time ) Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 93243 ("WEBID") http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=10&day=11&year=2013&hour=14&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 Agenda: Open Actions: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/open Issues: ISSUE-68: Privacy Considerations Section: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/68 I will send the spec for review to the privacy group this week ISSUE-71: Switch from URI to IRI http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/71 ISSUE-24: Privacy issues from WebID URI dereferencing http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/24 -> I think we should add that WebIDs Profiles should be made public, and not require any authentication ( or else infinite loops will occur ) -> If the user owns the server then he is the only person who will know of the request ISSUE-73: Security section in the Definition Spec http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/73 ISSUE-72: privacy consideration section in Definition Spec http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/72 ISSUE-18 Transfer Protocol Independence http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/18 Done Major: • Set timetable to publish current mercurial draft on CVS repo at http://webid.info/ • What do we need to do next to get these specs more formally adopted? Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 7 October 2013 10:52:37 UTC