- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 15:36:31 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5188063F.8040803@openlinksw.com>
On 5/6/13 3:12 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > I was going thru a few webid and I noticed that many public keys are > bnodes. > > Some consider this not best practice, and it also makes it harder to > reuse keys for signing, encryption, payments etc. > > Do you think there should be a line in the WebID+TLS spec saying that > the key SHOULD NOT be a bnode? The spec could make it clear that a public key can/could be denoted ("referred to") using its own HTTP URI. Of course, that will not invalidate WebIDs that resolve to profile graphs where Public Keys are "referred to" using blank nodes. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 May 2013 19:36:53 UTC