Re: editorial improvements for cert:key

On 31 March 2013 17:12, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

>
> On 31 Mar 2013, at 16:40, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#key
> >
> > "key - relates an agent to a key - most often the public key."
> >
> > Yet it has Range: cert:PublicKey
>
> The text is not well written out. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> :key a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:InverseFunctionalProperty;
>     vs:term_status "unstable";
>     rdfs:label "key"@en;
>         rdfs:isDefinedBy <cert#>;
>     owl:inverseOf :identity;
>     rdfs:comment """relates an agent to a key - most often the public
> key."""@en ;
>     rdfs:domain foaf:Agent;
>     rdfs:range :Key, :PublicKey .
>
> It says it is the owl:inverse of :identity
>
> :identity a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty;
>     vs:term_status "archaic";
>     rdfs:label "identity"@en;
>     rdfs:isDefinedBy <cert#>;
>     skos:editorialNote """
>          It turns out that this relation is unintuitive to write out and
> to name.
>          One should instead use cert:key
>     """@en;
>     rdfs:comment """
>     the identity of the public key. This is the entity that knows the
> private key and
>     so can decrypt messages encrypted with the public key, or encrypt
> messages that can
>     be decrypted with the public key.
>     """@en;
>     owl:inverseOf :key;
>     rdfs:domain :PublicKey .
>
> Since :key is the inverse of :identity we should move the text from
> :identity
> to :key (adapting for the inverse relation) Also we should remove the :key
> rdfs:range :Key, which is unecessary. When a property has two ranges, its
> range
> is the intersection of both, which in this case is :PublicKey .
>
> These are editorial improvements as they make no changes to the current
> ontology.
>

+1 :)


>
> Henry
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>