- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:04:09 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5156F0D9.8040000@openlinksw.com>
On 3/29/13 7:52 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > The issue here is (I suspect) a little cross communication. I > think you want to associate a Certificate (which is a Web > Resource) with Keys, and if so, see our ontology [2]. > > > no, simply that we already have 3 ontologies with public keys defined, > WOT,. sec & cert. > > public keys need not be tightly coupled with the technology promote > (which creates silos), cant we just have public key as a concept > without having to define yet another ontology > > > > Links: > > 1. > http://id.myopenlink.net/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Fauth%2Fcert%23key > 2. > http://id.myopenlink.net/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fschemas%2Fcert%23 > -- our specific certificate ontology which meshes with the cert. > ontology . > We define our conceptualization of keys in our own ontology. Multiple ontologies are inescapable in a global Semantic Web :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 30 March 2013 14:04:33 UTC