Re: bug in cert.n3

On 21 March 2013 12:59, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:

>
> On 21 Mar 2013, at 12:49, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 March 2013 13:56, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Mar 2013, at 13:20, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 March 2013 13:17, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Mar 2013, at 13:07, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 March 2013 13:05, Mo McRoberts <Mo.McRoberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think you meant :RSAPrivateKey there…
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, corrected.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Should it not also be subclass of RSAPublicKey, as it contains
>>>> everything in the pubkey plus additional properties?)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I dont think so because the exponents are different for private and
>>> public, tho modulus is the same (as it happens) ... in truth exponent
>>> should more accurately be named public_exponent
>>>
>>>
>>> the reason we called it exponent, is just that it's less typing, and the
>>> private exponent is rarely used.
>>>
>>> I suppose we lost this private key in moving the rsa ontology into the
>>> cert ontology...
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report.
>>>
>>
>> np, i think there's a few things we can quickly clean up
>>
>> from what i can see it's 3 files
>>
>> cert.n3
>>
>> cert.rdf
>> cert.hhml
>>
>> Do we need to make changes in triplicate?
>>
>>
>> Just the n3 file. Then we have scripts to generate the others. I think
>> the n3 file is in hg, if not it should be, as it is easier to track changes
>> there.
>>
>
> It's here:
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/file/99ffbed7a6b4/ontologies/cert.n3
>
> Is there a workflow for changes?  Can I change the file and send it to
> someone or, should I make my own branch etc.?
>
>
> Make your own branch is best. Then we can review. Then we can vote during
> teleconf. Then we can merge. Then I have to push the changes to CVS.
>

Thanks Henry, I'l do that.

I'll have to read up on hg how to do this cleanly as the default branch has:

update: 1 new changesets, 2 branch heads (merge)

For now I've enclosed the file with a simple bug fix to close this issue.
The change is to add:

:RSAPrivateKey a owl:Class;
    rdfs:label "RSA Private Key"@en;
    rdfs:isDefinedBy <cert#>;
    rdfs:subClassOf :PrivateKey, :RSAKey;
    vs:term_status "unstable";
    rdfs:seeAlso <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA>;
    rdfs:comment """
    The RSA private key.  Padded message m are encrypted by applying the
function
      modulus(power(m,exponent),modulus)
    """@en .

After this is fixed I can look at adding DSA.


>
> Henry
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Henry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> M.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue 2013-Mar-19, at 12:02, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I think I have found a bug in the cert ontology at
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert.n3
>>>> >
>>>> > :privateExponent
>>>> >    rdfs:domain :RSAPrivateKey;
>>>> >
>>>> > Is used yet :RSAPrivateKey is nowhere defined
>>>> >
>>>> > The correction should be:
>>>> >
>>>> > :RSAPublicKey a owl:Class;
>>>> >     rdfs:label "RSA Private Key"@en;
>>>> >     rdfs:isDefinedBy <cert#>;
>>>> >     rdfs:subClassOf :PrivateKey, :RSAKey;
>>>> >     vs:term_status "unstable";
>>>> >     rdfs:seeAlso <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA>;
>>>> >     rdfs:comment """
>>>> >     The RSA private key.  Padded message m are encrypted by applying
>>>> the function
>>>> >       modulus(power(m,exponent),modulus)
>>>> >     """@en .
>>>> >
>>>> > I have raised issue 77 to address this
>>>> >
>>>> > https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/77
>>>> >
>>>> > Please let me know if/how I can help action this fix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mo McRoberts - Analyst - BBC Archive Development,
>>>> Zone 1.08, BBC Scotland, 40 Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1DA,
>>>> MC3 D5, Media Centre, 201 Wood Lane, London W12 7TQ,
>>>> 0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>>>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless
>>>> specifically stated.
>>>> If you have received it in
>>>> error, please delete it from your system.
>>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>>>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>>>> immediately.
>>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>>>> sent or received.
>>>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>>>> this.
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Social Web Architect
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>
>>>
>>
>>     Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>>
>>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>