- From: Corey Mwamba <contact.me@coreymwamba.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:28:45 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20130603102845.51f95d62@corlap>
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:18:47 +0200 Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 3 Jun 2013, at 11:03, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ > <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > > > Henry, I must say that I really don't like tone of your message to > > Melvin :( > > > > I understand that sometimes we may feel irritated. Still in such > > situations I would strongly encourage all of us to: 1) save our > > reply as draft 2) take some time to come down, in most cases we > > don't really need to reply within minutes or even hours 3) read our > > message again once we feel in more positive mood and then decide if > > we really want to send it in such form or maybe would like to give > > it few edits thinking how other person/people may feel while > > reading it > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule > > > > I believe that we come here together to collaborate on addressing > > certain challenges, let's keep our working environment friendly so > > we can not only succeed but also ENJOY THE PROCESS :) > > Look I agree. Let's be more careful. But please also could people > spend time learning semantic web basics so that we can have advanced > conversations that use the tools we have at our disposal. A very good > book to read is Dean Allemang and Jim Hendler's "Semantic Web for the > Working Ontologist" I think it is a requirement if you are on this > group to be familiar with the semantic web tools up to that level at > least. Then our conversations can be guided by knowledge and > standards, and we can move along much more fluidly by working on the > shoulers of giants. We need to work with existing W3C standards and > build on them. That will reduce our work load here, and it is a very > good way to help guide us when choosing among the available options. > > Henry Wait a sec. I don't feel I have that level of knowledge. And this is a public list. Yet I have a WebID integrated into my site (http://www.coreymwamba.co.uk/contact/#me), allow WebID logins on my site and made a very simple PHP-based WebID generator (http://webid.coreymwamba.co.uk/creator). It might look like very small work, but it's out there now and - as a low level technical person - I am using this technology. I'm not an onotologist by training, but I'm using and am interested in the technology. Should I be on this list or not? -- http://www.coreymwamba.co.uk music = science + magic
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 09:31:40 UTC