We should perhaps start a discussion on privacy, so that we can send our spec to the privacy WG, for initial review. I presented WebID today there: http://www.w3.org/2013/01/24-privacy-minutes.html Henry On 23 Jan 2013, at 14:35, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > Meeting Time: > Friday 25 January, 15:00 UTC, 16:00 Paris, 10:00 New York > full time zone information: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130125T15&ah=1 > tel: +1-617-761-6200 > sip: zakim@voip.w3.org > irc: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/%23webid > > Agenda: > > WebID Definition > ---------------- > > Current results of vote. Discussion of where to go from there > ( vote won't be quite closed yet ). > > Use Case and Requirements Document > ---------------------------------- > > we have the following two pages up: > > - http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/User_Stories_and_Use_Cases > - http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements > > We are still looking at how to proceed here. > > Please mention ISSUE-41 in your mail, so we can find it quickly from the > issue-tracker. > https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/41 > > I have opened ISSUE-41. > > Web Access Control > ------------------ > > - Moving this over to WebID CG as it is an important use case of ours. > - Getting more traction on this would be useful. > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebAccessControl > > > e.g.: binding until formation of WG > > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:47 UTC